For the past, oh, it must be two months now, I have been going through my iTunes library to discover and rediscover the myriad tracks therein. Through the course of that, one of the things I noted was the similarity between the piano in Ingrid Michaelson's "Corner of Your Heart" and Adele's "Someone Like You". Maybe it just arose independently, and maybe they don't sound as similar as I think, but my brain says they do. But with brains bombarded by so much information and noise these days, it can be hell determining from where it is all derived. Take right now. I am listening to a track—one I will make note of later—with ESPN on (as I wait to cue up my next episode of Gossip Girl) and, oh, right, here I am typing.
And speaking of Gossip Girl, it's just always scooping me on music, just the like the mothertruckin' OC back in the day. If I'm not outright discovering a song through the show, I seem to only be a week or two ahead. Not that it matters, but it's sort of frightening the way it's tuned into a specific brainwave to which I adhere. Is it any wonder I keep tuning into the show, even when it gets worse and worse? At the close of a recent episode I caught Gotye's "Somebody That I Used to Know", which was not even credited. And not long before that it was Lana Del Rey's "Video Games."
It's amazing that, with the sheer volume of music, video, journalism, blog posts, and so on being created and the sheer number of outlets for them that there are a specific and small number of them that reach the great masses. There is a name for this phenomenon I am certain, somebody or other's law.
And oh my god Gossip Girl is killing me with the never-ending back and forth of these relationships and everyone is in love with everyone but not sure if they're really in love and somehow everyone is super conniving and crafty even the characters most peripherally pulled in. I get the concept of them all being tainted by the toxicity of the life but how are they so crafty so quickly and okay, alright, it's fiction. And they just quoted Camus?
I read this nifty little piece in The Paris Review where a high schooler in the 60s asked a bunch of contemporary authors about symbolism. It's pretty much what a lot of teenagers struggle through in high school English and some of the responses are excellent (they only show a few, but I'd like to read them all).
Google has released a new ad, as of about two weeks ago for Google +. I found it...depressing...So it goes.
At any rate that seems enough sort of information and information of sorts at the moment.
thanks for this post. the symbolism link helped me win a heated debate that occurred the day before thanksgiving, in which i argued that stephenie meyer did not intentionally write in symbolism by having the girl choosing between vampire and werewolf. my arguments were dismissed when it was discovered that i had not read the books, even though i am pretty familiar with the plot and comments people have made on her terrible writing style. also, when i looked up her name for spelling, i found that it was stephenie with no 'a' and thought that was weird.
ReplyDeletehappy holidays
L, I don't actually know who the L you are, as you don't have a pro(or even amateur)file, but I'm glad any time I can help settle a debate. This reply is about three months late, but so it goes sometimes.
ReplyDeleteHope that your holidays were happy as well.